The formula for tomorrow

It was announced on September 7th that Liberty Media have agreed to acquire the Formula One Group, a move which could have ramifications in the months and years ahead. The agreement needs to be go through numerous hurdles, and there is a chance that the deal could fall through at any of those stages.

In the short-term, there is unlikely to be an immediate change. However, there will be areas that Liberty Media may try to put their footprint on going forward, such as social media and content distribution.

Although it does not face an acquisition, MotoGP itself has issues to contend with going forward. Whilst the motor cycling series has equalised the championship somewhat with a series of technical measures to make it a more exciting show for the fans, there are obstacles that lie ahead.

Social media remains an area for MotoGP to exploit further. And, MotoGP has to ask the question: how does it replace Valentino Rossi? Can it replace Rossi without suffering decline?

The calendar and race weekend format
From the outset, I think it needs to be established that any move Liberty Media makes with relation to Formula 1 should cater to the fan of tomorrow and not necessarily the fan of today and yesterday. Does Liberty Media want to please the fifty-year-old who has been watching Formula 1 for thirty years, or do they want to please the twenty-year-old who has only just started watching the sport? Arguably, their decision-making should be tailored towards the latter group of people, and that should be the case for all motor sport series.

Yes, that may upset some of the veteran fans the sport, but it is fundamental that Liberty tries to sustain Formula 1 for the next generation moving forward. It is why I expect the format of the race weekend to be one of Liberty Media’s first points of enquiry. The traditionalist fan likes the 90 to 120 minute races. But would two x 45 minute races or some other variation generate a larger audience for the sport, or a more diverse audience?

If there was interest in doing that, broadcasters would benefit as a result: Sky for example would be able to maximise air-time out of two x 45 minute races than one x 90-minute race. You could also flexibly schedule, for example, racing at 17:00 during the European season when sunset is not until 21:00.

What I don’t think should happen, and something I’m firmly against, is expanding the calendar to 25 race weekends, something that applies to both Formula 1 and MotoGP, but is mooted in Liberty Media’s F1 presentation. If it did get to that stage, I think I would pick and choose which races I watch as opposed to watch all 25. I also think that, with 25 races, the audience actually becomes more dispersed. Picking and choosing what you watch would not open the sport to a larger audience.

Liberty Media need to be clever about the scheduling and not turn F1 into something that becomes over-exposed. 21 races push it to the boundary already and I fear 25 races would send it over the edge, and that is even without considering everyone associated with the F1 paddock that is on the road for those races. MotoGP have currently got it right: I’m left feeling that I want more with 18 races and wanting less than 21 races with F1 – although the state of the respective championships tells the story.

Aside from Formula 1, I wonder what Liberty Media may want to do with GP2 or GP3. Although GP2 and GP3 are miniscule in the grand scheme of things, the relationship between the feeder series’ and the main series’ is significantly different with F1 compared to MotoGP. Should GP2 and GP3 be integrated more into the main package in the same way Moto2 and Moto3 are with MotoGP, thus increasing the reach of GP2 and GP3 and benefiting F1 in the longer run? Should Liberty Media start from the ground upwards as opposed to ‘changing’ F1 straight away?

These are questions I anticipate Liberty Media will ask, there’s no right or wrong answer. I can foresee a full review of the race weekend being conducted, although the racing on track is only as good as the design of the car itself. A poorly designed car not suited to overtaking means that the racing will be boring as a result unless you bring gimmicks into the show.

Social media and television rights
One of MotoGP’s biggest strengths over Formula 1 by some margin is social media, thanks to the rights holder working with the teams in order to generate the best result for the championship.

Even better for us is the past two years have seen a fundamental change in how [Dorna] interact with the teams via social media. In the past it has very much been standalone. MotoGP and social media, it’s to promote the championship, it’s to promote MotoGP. The teams had been left to themselves, we don’t have that audience at all. Even the biggest team here does not have the audience that the championship has across Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Now, they couldn’t help us anymore than they are. – In conversation with Ian Wheeler (part 1)

MotoGP is several years ahead of Formula 1 where social media is concerned, something that Liberty Media should recognise. Social media was previously a ‘dirty’ word for both Formula 1 and MotoGP, but the latter adopted earlier. Formula 1 has been hindered by previous reluctance of those higher in the chain to exploit social media. I’ve spoken before about what Formula 1 needs to do in the new media space: short-form present day relevant video (see below for more on this point), genuine synergy between on-screen and social media and the creation of an over-the-top network, similar to the WWE Network or, a bit closer to home, the MotoGP Video Pass.

The Liberty Media purchase makes an over-the-top network more likely in my opinion. Their presentation to investors makes reference to opportunities including “enhancing distribution of content, especially in digital” and to monetise the digital space where possible. Again, this will not be an overnight shift but one over the next year or two. The problem for Liberty is that the world around us is moving at a fast pace: Formula 1 is already behind the curve. F1’s job is not to implement the trend of today or yesterday, but to look at the trends that are starting to emerge.

Dorna held a social media workshop for MotoGP’s teams, which included representatives from Google, Facebook and Twitter. Liberty Media should strongly consider doing the same for Formula 1 if Formula One Management (FOM) have not already. Evidently Dorna’s workshop has helped MotoGP significantly in the past two years to move onto the right track.

Hand-in-hand with social media goes the television rights of today and tomorrow. Should Formula 1’s television rights be less restrictive, meaning that FOM can post more video content during each race weekend? Arguably, yes. This works to the advantage of MotoGP which posts a race incident, in turn going viral to the benefit of all who work within the championship. #SepangClash is the incident I always mention, 15 million views on Facebook is simply an amazing example of something on track going viral. Formula 1 has missed so many golden opportunities to go ‘viral’ this season, thanks to the restrictive television deals in place with the likes of Sky Sports.

To start with here, the idea that Liberty Media is going to rip up any contract in place now or scheduled to begin in the future is nonsense. But, there does need to be a way to allow Formula 1 to flourish on social media with new, innovative and informative content, yet get the big bucks from pay-TV, whilst also keeping the sport accessible to the widest possible audience. It is a fine balance to try to achieve. MotoGP appears to have the social media element built into its television contracts (saying that Dorna is free to exploit MotoGP in video form for X minutes of content on social media), whereas FOM doesn’t have this built into contracts.

Should Formula 1 and Liberty Media take a (slight) financial hit by reducing pay-TV income, thus loosening up on their social media as a result? I think so, but it is not a simple yes or no answer.

Creating global superstars
The ambition of both Formula 1 and MotoGP is to reach as many viewers as possible. Each series has drivers or riders. But beyond them, there are stars that transcend motor sport: Lewis Hamilton, Valentino Rossi, Fernando Alonso and Marc Marquez to name just a few and there are many countless names that have previously done that. A good percentage of viewers watch Formula 1 and MotoGP for the household, blockbuster figures. The ‘Bolt’ of the field. But, what happens when one of those names disappears?

Valentino Rossi has been a house hold name for MotoGP fans for two decades. Soon, his time on the racing circuit will come to end, but MotoGP will continue. Rossi’s reach in MotoGP is comparable to the likes of Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher in Formula 1. What will happen to MotoGP when Rossi retires?

There’s lots and lots of talent [coming through the MotoGP ranks], the problem is: how do you replace an icon like Valentino Rossi? The honest answer is you don’t. What you have to do is mitigate the effect. So what you want when he goes is a stable, attractive product in place which will retain some of the existing fan base. The idea is people come and see Valentino Rossi, but they stay because they find MotoGP an interesting and exciting sport. – In conversation with David Emmett

In my opinion, an opinion shared by leading paddock voices, is that MotoGP will suffer a short-term dip. But, thanks to the moves Dorna have made in the past few years technically, they are in a much better position to keep their current audience. Can MotoGP have another global superstar like Valentino Rossi? In the next five to ten years it is highly unlikely, but you never know what is around the corner.

Max Verstappen could become Formula 1’s next superstar. Whilst is in everyone’s interests to create a global superstar, as it boosts the sport as a whole in every metric possible, what isn’t in everyone’s interest is to try to force the next superstar onto us. The emergence of Max Verstappen should happen naturally over the next few years, but there is a worry that the bubble could burst before it has started, thanks to the early hype surrounding his Spanish Grand Prix victory and everything following that. Trying to replicate an aura from someone beforehand is dooming to fail.

Overall, although Formula 1 is significantly bigger, MotoGP feels more confident about the direction it is going in thanks to moves made across the board in recent years to increase the competition on the track, whilst increasing pay-TV revenue, yet keeping the sport open via social media. It will be fascinating to see what effect Liberty Media has, if any, on the state of the Formula 1 circus.

In conversation with Steve Day

From former racer during his teenage years to Dorna’s World Feed commentator in their MotoGP coverage, Steve Day (@SteveDayGP) has moved up the commentary ladder in recent years.

Whilst Silverstone was getting a soaking during the fourth MotoGP practice session on Saturday, myself and Steve took cover for a quick chat, looking at how he prepares for a race weekend and how to get the best out of a commentary pairing.

F1B: Thanks for this interview Steve. To start with, just give us a brief introduction to yourself and how you got to where you are today.

SD: I actually raced myself when I was younger. I started out in the Aprilia Superteens when I was aged 15 back in 2000. I suppose you could call it unlucky really, but I was racing against the likes of Casey Stoner, Cal Crutchlow, Chaz Davies and so on. I raced for two or three seasons, went to the British championship and crashed quite a bit. Ultimately, I realised quite quickly that I wasn’t going to make it like those around me and it was costing quite a lot of money, it’s an expensive game. I decided when I was about 23 or 24 that we’d call it a day racing. And then for a few years I was working at car dealerships, Volkswagen and Toyota. My Dad was involved in a race series called Thundersport GB and they needed someone for free to come and prat around basically on a microphone! I thought I’d give it a go, so on weekends when I was free, I’d go and do that. For the first few seasons, I commentated and gave it a go. Someone said it sounded alright! I think it was in 2010, I was commentating on the Sidecar Championship for Eurosport and I spoke to Eurosport to ask if there were any openings. At the time there weren’t too many but they gave me a go [with MotoGP] and it just went from year-to-year really from strength to strength. I’ve gone from earning no money, doing it part-time for a few years to now sitting here in the Grand Prix paddock and yeah, I’m loving it.

F1B: Now that you’re a commentator, you used to race bikes so that must be a pretty big advantage in that you’ve, sort of, been there and done that.

SD: It’s a massive help because you understand the mind of a rider a little more. You can appreciate how the crashes feel, what a rider is going through on the bike. You have the general understanding of how a bike works, I’ve found it an aid to my commentary. Okay, I wasn’t racing at a world championship level, but it’s definitely been a help.

F1B: You know the basics.

SD: Yep.

F1B: Just thinking about the current season, how do you prepare for the season and for this weekend?

SD: As a commentator, you have to do a lot of research. There is paperwork around the house everywhere. I tend to start with the riders, so I’ll look at all the riders and I’ll just try to get as much research as possible. There’s a fair amount in your head, I’ve been a bike racing fan for a long time as well as a former rider, so a large quantity is already in your head because you’re sitting and watching it on your couch anyway. It’s just a matter of going through every single piece of research that you can on each rider, writing it down as it stores the information in your head a little easier when you write things down. And then researching the circuit information, the rules on the championship, the bikes. The start of the season is definitely tougher because there are normally new faces, new coloured bikes that you have to get used to, different styles of helmets. On a round-by-round basis, I have data on my iPad that I then update after each round and I’ll add to that as well in between rounds and get ourselves ready for the weekend.

F1B: How is the dynamic in the commentary box between different co-commentators, do you have a preference, what’s the protocol?

SD: I’ve always been a lead commentator, so I’ve always had what they call an expert in with me. I’ve had the chance, since working with Eurosport and now with Dorna, to work with around 15 or 16 different commentators from ex-riders to general experts. I don’t necessarily have a preference, I tend to try to have a conversation before I’m working with someone just to try and work out what their style of commentary is and then try and work within that. It’s no good constantly talking over each other, I think you have to have an out of commentary box relationship with that person as well, it works really well. Last year, I worked with Greg Haines. Me and Greg [Haines] off circuit got on like a house on fire, it worked because you can feel that. Me and Matt [Birt] this year, we get along really well, we have some common interests, we’re good mates so that works as well. Some of the ex-riders I’ve worked with, the likes of Neil Hodgson, had a great rapport with him. Julian Ryder, he’s brilliant at what he does, I’ve worked with him as well. So yeah, a mixture of different types of commentators. You have to just try and work out yourself, put the feelers out and try and find the right dynamic.

F1B: For you guys it’s important that you have the relationship, because chances are you’ll be sitting in the box next to each other for seven hours.

SD: You have. I’ve not been in a situation where I’ve necessarily worked with anybody that I don’t like which is a bonus! I’ve worked with other commentators who perhaps haven’t done the job for very long so you end up talking a little more than others. But 100 percent, if you’ve got some rapport, have a bit of a laugh, you’ve got that relationship outside the commentary box then it does come out on air.

F1B: Sepang last year, [Valentino] Rossi vs [Marc] Marquez, how was it?

SD: Believe it or not, I wasn’t actually commentating on that race, I was sitting at home watching it. In that moment, there were perhaps a few swear words from the couch! I couldn’t actually believe what I’d saw. In so many ways, it was bad for the season, in other ways it raised interest. People were then on the edge of their seats ready for the final round. It was certainly full of drama. It would have been nice if the championship had gone to the final round with them fighting all fair and square, but it didn’t happen. It was probably the most dramatic moment I’ve ever seen in MotoGP for sure.

F1B: Looking ahead to MotoGP’s future, obviously part of that future is a MotoGP without Rossi. How will it play out?

SD: It’s a question that a lot of people have asked because of the character of Rossi and his legendary status. But it takes more than one rider to make a championship. Every sport has its icons, and MotoGP will be fine. The series has never been healthier than it is right now; the crowds are record-breaking.

F1B: You would think today (Saturday) is a race day at Silverstone.

SD: Yeah, exactly, it is busy. The key at the moment is that Rossi doesn’t want to retire, he’s extended his deal and he’s still in great form. He’s in better form this year than he was last year, he’s just been unlucky in a few of the races. However, I would say post-Rossi, I don’t know. Some people think that MotoGP will go downhill when Rossi leaves. Okay, there won’t be another Valentino, he’s an amazing character but the sport will maintain the same interest. Of course this assumes he does retire, he might go until he’s 50!

F1B: Imagine us sitting here having the same conversation in ten years’ time!

SD: For me, while he keeps performing at this level, I would not be surprised in the slightest if at the end of 2018 he was to announce another deal.

F1B: Another area of course is social media. How do you find social media, of course you’re a commentator so you get reaction in when things have happened, how do you think social media will play out?

SD: I think social media is absolutely key in the modern era and I think its massive now for MotoGP. They’re understanding how important social media is. I suppose in a way I’m quite lucky, because I’m 32, I’ve come in at a time when social media has already been a big part of my life anyway. I think that for a lot of the people who have been here pre social media takeover, they’re now understanding how important it is. I think it’s the best way of reaching out to people. I’m one of those people who probably checks their Twitter feed all too often.

F1B: Just like me!

SD: Yeah, all too often! But it is the era that we’re in, there’s less paper about. People go onto Twitter and onto Facebook to find out the information. It’s in a healthy state, it has to be utilised in the right way and I think MotoGP are doing that.

F1B: Where do you see yourself in the next few years, currently you’re the MotoGP commentator, but do you want to do other sports or do you want to do other roles within the paddock?

SD: I don’t know. I’ve done other sports with Eurosport and I always like to test myself. I think there might be a point in the future where I may want to branch out and do something else, at the moment I’m happy within bike racing as a whole, not necessarily just MotoGP, but all bike racing. I’m happy doing what I’m doing, but I’m still young and I’ve got time on my side. I can’t say that one day I might take on something at the Olympics, who knows. At the moment, I’m happy with my role, I love being a commentator, and it’s nice and dry in the commentary box which is a bonus!

My thanks go to Steve Day for spending the time with me on the above interview.

In conversation with Ian Wheeler (part two)

My conversation with Ian Wheeler, who is the Marc VDS Marketing and Communications Manager, continues (part one can be found here).

In the second and final part, we talk about social media and how Dorna have increasingly helped MotoGP’s teams over the past few seasons.

IW: The other good thing about social media is that all of our partners have an active social media department as part of their marketing department. So what we do on social media is very visible to our sponsors. Not only that, but they can also see our metrics, and where they can’t see the metrics, then we supply the metrics. For them, the most important metrics we have are TV, the EAV (equivalent advertising value), which we give to our sponsors, I don’t know if any other teams do. The other thing is the social media metrics because they know that their social media accounts are also there, they want to see how our metrics compare to theirs. So, again it’s another way of measuring their return on investment in the sponsorship, it’s a very visible way of communicating.

F1B: It’s good to see the reluctance has disappeared, it really is.

IW: It sort of happened overnight. We were all invited to a social media workshop in Jerez last year, they [Dorna] brought a couple of people from Facebook, a guy from Twitter.

F1B: Were all the teams there?

IW: It was all the MotoGP teams.

F1B: Wow. I think that shows that Dorna really wanted to do something about social media.

IW: They brought in specifically Aiste Milasiute as the Social Media Manager. In the past, they’ve had a community manager, but not with the seniority to set policy. This was a change I guess quite high up at Dorna to change the policy and to bring in a Social Media Manager. She came in and the whole system changed overnight. They’ve provided the link to Facebook and Twitter, which we would have never been able to have as individual teams. All of a sudden the doors were open. Now I speak to the guy at Twitter, not frequently but if I want to know something, I sent him an e-mail and within a day I get an answer.

F1B: From what I gather, it sounds like things have changed for the positive.

IW: The biggest thing for a race team when working with sponsors is that we are limited by budget on what sort of support infrastructure we can have. The marketing department in the team is basically me. Our team principal Michael Bartolini, he’s involved in the commercial and marketing side and that’s about it. When you look at one of our sponsors, for example Estrella Galicia or Total, these are big companies with a big, active marketing department as they’re big consumer brands. For them, social media is one of their key channels of communication. For us to be able to go to them and say “okay, we have these chances now, we can promote your involvement in MotoGP through these channels.” But it’s not just us, it’s when MotoGP helps us out sharing this information, the figures are incredible. Sometimes we put things on social media and we don’t highlight it to MotoGP, we save it for something when we know the numbers are going to be good. The difference between that and something that is shared by MotoGP is huge. For us, it’s the biggest step forward in terms of providing our sponsors with ROR (return-on-relationship).

F1B: MotoGP without Valentino Rossi. How will that effect things going forward, will sponsors leave?

IW: It’s a difficult question. I don’t think sponsors will leave. Valentino Rossi is the most recognisable figure in MotoGP. Sometimes we speak to companies who have never had any involvement in motor cycle racing. You speak to them about MotoGP, you explain to them what it is and as soon as you mention the words Valentino Rossi “ah, yeah, we know him.” He is a massive part of our sport. He’s the biggest rider out there, he transcends MotoGP. He’s a little bit like what Barry Sheene was for the British in the 70s and 80s. He’s gone outside of the sporting environment and he is a real celebrity. To lose a celebrity like that, especially somebody as clever as he is. To lose his persona is always going to be difficult for the championship. But it’s not going to have a massive negative impact. Yeah, we won’t see the yellow smoke across the grandstands in Mugello. But those grandstands will still be full, they’ll just be full of people who are supporting other riders. I don’t think we are going to see a big downturn in interest, maybe we will have a small dip at the start where the fanatical Valentino Rossi fans will maybe think about whether they want to continue supporting, but I think the core following MotoGP will not dip so much and I think it will continue to grow. I think it’ll be a long time before we see another Valentino Rossi.

F1B: He’s a once in a generation.

IW: It is. Maybe once every two generations. But we have the riders, we have the close racing, it’s just this personality we will be missing. So, yeah it will have an impact on the championship but I don’t think it will have a negative impact that some of the doom-mongers would have you believe.

F1B: One last question: have you heard of virtual reality?

IW: Well it’s funny you should mention that.

F1B: It’s meant to be the next big thing.

IW: I have heard of virtual reality. One of the things that social media has done is forced MotoGP and other sports teams in general to reconsider how they deliver content. When I first started in 2001 as a press officer, you only really had one way to do it then and that was an e-mail to journalists who you’d hope would pick up what you sent and put it in their print content. Or you soft soaped the TV people and hoped they mentioned your riders, teams and so on more than anybody else. Now, it’s completely different. We don’t have to rely on the TV to speak to the fans, to promote our sponsors to our potential customers, because we have that audience ourselves. But that audience, their demand for content is different to how the journalists worked in 2001. They don’t want them to send them a press release because they already have all the information about that session, that race aggregated by websites which turn the information around so quickly. Even the teams can’t compete with that. What the teams are being forced to look at now is what content works best on social media. It’s photography, it’s short paragraphs of information, it’s video. And now teams are having to look at this and say “okay, we weren’t really set up to do this.” We were set up to communicate in a traditional manner, where we send press releases, we put them on the website and then we take the links from the website and post them onto Facebook and Twitter. And we still do that, because the press releases are our document of record and the website is our repository for that. But we’re all being forced now to come up with new ideas for content.

One of the ways we’ve changed massively over the last two years is that we put a lot of resource into new content. Short, not produced to Hollywood standard, but just to try to get a behind the scenes look. Dorna have reacted to this, their TV rights are very important, safeguarding those TV rights is critical to the future of the championship. But they also realise that the teams need to promote themselves, and by extension promote the championship. So, for example one of the things that has been relaxed in the past year is filming. Before, it was impossible for us to film, unless we organised a private test at great expense and then went and filmed there. Now, they realise that we need this opportunity to film the sponsors. We can film, we have to ask for permission and get the footage authorised by Dorna, but now we can film during MotoGP tests. This is a huge advantage to us. I think when it was allowed us, LCR Honda, who are also very progressive, and a couple of other teams were straight onto this since it benefits the sponsors.

Now, every time we go to a test (Brno and Austria before the Summer break), every team is doing it. Whether it be a professional video camera, we invested in some equipment so that we could slow-motion for MotoGP because it’s quite interesting. We’ve got Pramac with GoPro, they’re quite inventive about what they do, the content is very, very popular. The teams have changed, and it’s not just to the benefit of the teams, it’s for the benefit of the people who invest time into our race weekends, because its popular content that promotes the championship. And Dorna, quite rightly, have opened this up but also kept some control regarding the quality of the videos that goes out, which is also important to protect the championship. We’ve never had them say “no, you can’t use this.” We go and film at a test, we share it on social media and Dorna then step in and help us again by sharing the content again. So it’s win-win for us. They got a lot of criticism, but with the changing social media policy, their understanding of what the teams need to do to secure the sponsorship, to secure the racing outfit, there is a massive difference now compared to three years ago – a positive difference. I can’t fault them for that, I really can’t, it’s been a very clever thing to do.

F1B: Is there anything further you want to add that we haven’t already talked about?

IW:  The only other thing is cost cutting. We’ve seen cost cutting measures brought into the paddock and in reality, they might cut costs initially but teams will always find a way of spending money. It’s just the way it is, you cut costs there but increase costs here. It’s only going to cost us this amount of money, so we go and do it. To race at this level costs a lot of money. What I think Dorna have done well is give the teams the tools they need to bring this money. Some teams use it more effectively than others, not so much in MotoGP because you don’t get to race in MotoGP without being able to generate money. But in Moto2 and Moto3, you see that some teams are much more effective at what they can produce to secure the budget they need, and all of it helped by Dorna, and that’s probably the most profitable change.

My thanks go to Ian Wheeler for spending the time with me on the above interview.

In conversation with Ian Wheeler (part one)

Thursday in the British MotoGP paddock was a busy day for myself. Alongside my conversation with David Emmett, I also had a chat with Ian Wheeler (@IanWheeler) who is currently Marketing and Communications Manager with the Marc VDS Racing Team.

I have split the conversation over two parts. In this part, myself and Wheeler chat about the logistics of preparing for a race weekend, along with an introduction to where MotoGP currently stands in the social media landscape, a topic that we will also cover in part two.

F1B: Thank you for the interview Ian, just give us a little bit of your background, what you’ve done before, what has led you to where you are today.

IW: Like a lot of people in the paddock, I used to race and was pretty poor at it, I stopped before I seriously injured myself! I ended up going off and doing something completely different away from racing into a normal job. I went to work for a defence contractor and they put me in charge of their website which I knew nothing about. I decided that I’d learn how websites work by building one. I was away on a trip to Malaysia, the same weekend as the first British Superbike weekend. I went online to find out who won what and couldn’t find anything anywhere. I came back, started a British Superbike website, went to the races myself, did the interviews and it just took off because there was no other source of information. As a result, I ended up working for an online company Bike Net and then from there started working for Kawasaki in British Superbikes and also took over as editor of Motorcycle Racer Magazine. With Kawasaki I moved from British Superbike to World Superbike and onto MotoGP in 2003. I stayed with Kawasaki as their Marketing and Communications Manager until 2009 when they stopped. I had a couple of years with Dorna doing the pit lane commentary and then in 2010 came back on this side of the fence with Marc VDS when we came back into Moto2. And obviously being with Marc VDS now, the 2014 championship win and the move to MotoGP with Scott [Redding] in 2015 and now with the two riders in 2016.

F1B: Wow, so the British Superbike stuff I’m guessing that was when the internet started to become a thing?

IW: I was doing it around 1999 and 2000. Then in 2001, I was a press officer for the Kawasaki team, still a little bit involved in the website but not as much. They sold out to another company, gave it to them and they carried it on.

F1B: You moved from Kawasaki to Dorna, what was it that prompted the move from team to rights holder?

IW: At the end of 2008, there were issues with the economy in Japan and the exchange rate, so they decided to stop racing. When you’re developing a factory bike in MotoGP, it is a fairly big financial commitment, and they decided that they had higher priorities at the time commercially. So they stopped the MotoGP project, it was around about Christmas time in 2008, which meant that we were too late to find another position in 2009 with another team. I sat at home doing some freelance and then Michael Morel from Dorna called me saying that we’ve lost our pit lane reporter, do you fancy doing it. I wasn’t doing anything that was keeping me too busy at the time and it was an opportunity to come back to the paddock. I’ve never done it before, apart from once when they made me stand in at Rockingham with Fred Clarke. I thought it sounded like an interesting change, I did it and enjoyed it. Then in 2010, I got a phone call off my ex-boss at Kawasaki Michael Bartolini saying that we’re going racing again and can you come to Belgium. I continued with Dorna for the rest of 2010 but by then it was starting to get difficult.

F1B: What did you learn with Dorna that you were able to bring back to the team?

IW: It’s a good question. When I worked in this role with Kawasaki, your circle of influence is quite small by choice because you’re focussed on securing the exposure for the team, promoting the sponsors and partners for the team. So you’re focussed on a small part. When you’re doing it from the other side where you’re effectively now the journalist and you require things from other teams, then it opens up this circle of context. What I found was that I got a lot of help from the teams. A lot of people in pit lane are looking for the same story and the same information. I got a lot of help from the guys at Yamaha, the guys from Honda, who I only really knew in passing because it wasn’t where my focus was with Kawasaki. When I came back to the team [Marc VDS], it was helping these guys out rather than always looking for the angle. These guys have a tough job, they have to keep people updated, it’s better to help them with information that you normally wouldn’t think to give to them because it is of no advantage to you or the team.  It’s better to build the relationship with these people who do quite a difficult job and are under a lot of pressure. If something goes wrong in the race or in practice, it can be quite stressful. We can help a lot because we have access to the information faster than they do.

F1B: Thinking more about your Dorna role, but also your current role, what sort of preparation is involved for each weekend?

IW: They’re different, but also similar. With Dorna, the Monday before a race you start looking at what is happening across all three classes, looking at the news feeds to see if anything is happening that you need to be aware of, specifically with riders. It is learning about the characteristics of the track, is it going to be hard on tyres, is fuel consumption going to be an issue for the MotoGP bikes. How does the track suit the characteristics of each of the bikes, does the track suit the Honda or the Yamaha. It is also looking for stories that others may not have picked up on by using the contacts in the paddock rather than just looking at the news feeds. It is to make sure that when you arrive on the Thursday at the press conference, or sometimes interviewing specific riders, you were up to speed with everything that is going on rather than to walk into the paddock and be surprised at something. Over the course of the weekend, each evening you go through what’s gone on during the day, pick out the interesting stories for the following day. It is to try to stay ahead of the people who you are broadcasting to.

F1B: What about your job role now with Marc VDS, what preparation do you do?

IW: It is twofold really. On the one hand it is the media responsibilities for the riders, organising the media schedule for the riders in terms of access to journalists, access to TV, specific TV interview features. When the rider arrives on Wednesday, there should be a riders’ schedule explaining exactly what they need to do, what time, who it’s for, which country it is going out in.

F1B: Makes their life easier.

IW: No, it makes my life easier because then I don’t have to spend hours speaking to their answer phone! It’s just so they know exactly what they have to do, who they’re doing it for and for TV features, we’ll give them a little bit of background about what the journalist is looking for so they don’t go into the interview cold. On the other side, we also have responsibilities for the sponsors. For example, this race, Pro-Bolt is one of our sponsors here, they’re based here in the UK and have been a loyal sponsor since 2010. We’ve got some events with them, which we also use the riders for. We’ve got guests from Estrella Galicia who is our biggest sponsor, so it’s making sure we have a programme for them that includes the riders, pit box tours and also it is scheduling commercial meetings. It is easier to have commercial meetings at the race track as the sponsors are based in that country as well, rather than flying in for a meeting between races. A little bit of everything really.

F1B: Sounds pretty good. The whole area of sponsors leads me nicely onto our next subject: MotoGP’s future with regards social media. Where do you see MotoGP from a social media perspective going?

IW: The most important thing is the championship itself, the product if you like. What we’ve seen over the past few years from Dorna is some quite clever moves to strength the championship, to make it more attractive, to make it more unpredictable and interesting to the viewer. We’ve also see a massive step forward with the TV coverage. The quality is absolutely fantastic. When you compare us to Formula 1 in terms of TV coverage, I think Dorna exceeds what Formula 1 does. Okay, they [Dorna] have a little bit more freedom because we don’t have the rigid rules about the driver access. What they focus their non-race coverage on is exactly what people want, the personalities. Not just on the riders, but the people who you would want to see on the TV, Tito Rabat’s crew chief or Sam Lowes’ tyre guy who you see all the time. They build these interesting personalities because we have some really interesting characters, most of them have got their own story which MotoGP tell very well in different ways with the TV coverage but also their online video coverage. So, we have a strong championship, we have a strong TV presence. They’ve done a lot of the job for us in MotoGP rather than Moto2 or Moto3 of building these interesting personalities. Their social media policy has changed massively over the past two years; they’ve really taken on-board the fact that social media is one of the most powerful communication tools. They’ve brought in people to make the most of that. You look at their audience on social media, it is constantly growing. Even if you don’t understand social media, you can’t argue with the figures.

Even better for us is the past two years have seen a fundamental change in how they interact with the teams via social media. In the past it has very much been standalone. MotoGP and social media, it’s to promote the championship, it’s to promote MotoGP. The teams had been left to themselves, we don’t have that audience at all. Even the biggest team here does not have the audience that the championship has across Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Now, they couldn’t help us anymore than they are. They really are making a massive difference, they share content, they are proactive with us, they give us advice “okay, if you do this, then we can share that, this is the benefit you get from it.” If there is something we don’t understand or something we want to know, their door is open, we go to speak to them and they always have something constructive to say or some way to help us out. It has allowed the teams to look at how they utilise social media. Our way has not changed, we focus very much on the personalities, we focus on our riders because that is where the interest is. We’re not a factory team, we have a responsibility to our sponsors, in terms of their image and also securing coverage for them. We’re not limited in the same way the factory teams are by the corporate style, we have a little bit more leeway on how we use social media. It allows us to have a much better relationship with not just the fans but also the journalists as well, we feed information out on social media specifically for the journalists as well as putting information out there for the fans. One example is a rider who crashes during a session, for us social media is the fastest way to communicate that the rider is okay or what has happened to the rider. The fans see it, they’re happy. The journalists see it, including the TV commentators. They have the Twitter feed open while they’re commentating as it’s a good source of information, they get the information and push it straight out on TV.

My thanks go to Ian Wheeler for spending the time with me on the above interview. In part two, we continue to look at MotoGP’s future, and Ian explains what is meant by a ‘social media’ workshop.

In conversation with David Emmett

Ahead of the British round of the 2016 MotoGP championship, I sat down with David Emmett (@MotoMatters), talking all things MotoGP.

The interview covered a vast array of subjects, including testing, social media, and what MotoGP may look like post Valentino Rossi.

F1B: Thank you for this interview, just give us a brief overview of yourself. How did you get into MotoGP?

DE: My name is David Emmett; I work for MotoMatters. I did all sorts of stuff when I was much younger. I spent five years working as a translator, then worked as a technical editor. In 2005, I wanted to start a blog.  I wrote an entry saying “this is my blog” and I’m going to write my thoughts there, except I didn’t write anything at all for a year! Ahead of the 2006 season, I wrote a MotoGP preview and people were quite positive about it. Because it got so many positive responses, I continued writing about it. At the time I was working as a software developer looking at Content Management Systems and I did the two of them together for two years. In September 2008, I decided to quit my job as I was getting enough interest that I thought I could make a living from it. A few days after that the Lehman Brothers collapsed and the whole house of cards fell apart. I didn’t have a job, so had to make a go of it. I went to races, people read my stuff, liked my stuff. That’s how I ended up here. I grew up with motorcycles, my Uncle raced grass track in the 1970s and 1980s. When I was a teenage, I had a picture of a Yamaha RD350 hanging above my bed. So, that was it really.

F1B: You mentioned translating, it’s actually really important for a journalist to have some translator skills.

DE: It’s basically language skills. Just being able to make sense of stuff. You are trained as a writer, I also worked as a technical editor where you had to digest complicated technical information. It was the technical writers who were writing it, I was editing their copy so I had to make sure I could understand what they were trying to convey. You learnt a lot about communicating.

F1B: Interesting to know that you started blogging before blogging became popular.

DE: I don’t know; I would say blogging started to become a thing in the mid-2000s. I got in I wouldn’t say early, but I wouldn’t say late. One of the advantages of being old is that when you do things, quite often you’ve done things early just because you happen to be old enough to actually understand it.

F1B: Moving onto the current day, you guys are going to every race this season I assume.

DE: I’m going to about 12 of the 18 this season. I don’t go to the overseas races; I don’t go to Le Mans because it is shit. It’s a fantastic place to go for a 24-hour car race, I really want to go to that and I don’t like cars, I don’t own a car. The atmosphere at the track is awful, it is not a nice track. I don’t go to the Asian fly away races, I don’t go to Qatar because it is horrible, I don’t go to Argentina because it is almost impossible to get there.

F1B: Do you go to the pre-season tests as well?

DE: I go to at least one of the pre-season Sepang tests, especially the first one. The new bikes are being pulled out, riders have had the winter to go away and think. Immediately after Valencia, you have the post-season tests. You saw it at the end of the last year with [Valentino] Rossi, Rossi was so upset that his mind was not really on testing. What you see is that people are tired after 18 races, the season takes a lot out of them physically. The bike hasn’t really taken shape yet, the bike they roll out at Sepang is much closer to what they will actually be racing. It is about trying stuff, what works and what doesn’t. Testing is also boring. Those eight hours of track time, especially at Sepang because of the heat, they spend two hours on track. You’ve got a lot of time to talk to people which you don’t have at a race weekend because the race weekends are so intense.

F1B: There was a whole thing a few years ago where people wanted testing live.

DE: Testing is a bit like cricket, it is much more interesting when you listen to it on the radio or via the timing screens. You see much more of a story. The actual process of testing doesn’t have the intensity. It is much more difficult to understand because different people are doing different things. Testing highlights are really interesting, live coverage of testing is really, really boring. I remember in 2010 when Valentino Rossi switched to Ducati, they had live coverage of testing then and it rained in the morning. The track was wet, it was cold, nobody really wanted to go out. They sent one of the test riders out to go and circulate and to dry the track out. They were desperate for something to happen. I think they sent Rossi out for five laps and brought him back in again. There’s always pressure to create that content, but the content you are curating is not particularly memorable. There’s about seven hardcore MotoGP geeks that would sit there all day and watch it.

F1B: So, you’re going to 12 of the 18 races this season, tell us in a little bit more detail how you prepare for the races.

DE: To be perfectly honest, I don’t do a great deal of preparation. It is more of a continuous thing. You are thinking about what you are doing, and I try to watch the race from last year. I’ll go through the results of previous races, take a look at the race track, read a few press releases. This year Michelin have come in, new tyre manufacture, you read their press release to try and understand what they’re not telling you, what the story is, what they’re doing. For me, it is part of a larger narrative, it’s not a race weekend, it’s another chapter in the story of the season.

F1B: I’d assume it is a lot more intense for the TV guys considering they’re on air for seven hours.

DE: Oh yeah, absolutely. I wait for things to happen and then write about them afterwards.

F1B: I guess we can talk about Rossi and [Marc] Marquez, the approach [between TV and online] would be completely different.

DE: Exactly. I can go and talk to people. For example, the last race in Brno, all of the tyre issues. The TV guys are reacting immediately, they’re unprepared for it. They can do a certain amount of prep; they may have talked to people after warm-up, but I get the chance to talk to all of the riders first, talk to crew chiefs, talk to people from Michelin and then form an opinion. Because it is more reactive it requires less preparation, because I write 2,000 words in the evening, I have time to sit down and think about it.

F1B: How was Sepang last year?

DE: I wasn’t there. It was just really strange [the crash]. But I was talking to the rest of the media that were there, we were chatting via WhatsApp trying to figure out what was going on, what the atmosphere was like. It was very odd. Those are the times that you wish you were there, because then you can go around afterwards and actually talk to people. But then, being at home, it meant that I could watch that clip over and over. If I had been at the race, I would not have had time to sit down and watch it.  So instead, I sat down and watched those two laps for two hours trying to figure out the whole story.

F1B: And then the championship went to Valencia, where I think there was crazy behaviour from what I remember.

DE: Amongst the fans it was fine, there was nothing there. The fans were booing [Jorge] Lorenzo and Marquez, but then they often boo them so it was not that much different. There was some oddness, not really craziness. The fact that they scrapped the press conference was a mistake. I think Dorna got caught unawares by that as well, they were not expecting it all to happen with the CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport) appeal against the penalty. That also made it a little bit more difficult as we were sitting around waiting for the outcome of this appeal.

F1B: This leads us nicely onto talking about MotoGP’s future. Part of that future is social media. Social media activity jumps when incidents like that happen, which can be a good thing.

DE: Absolutely. MotoGP and social media have a very long history. I’ve been on social media since 2009. At first, Dorna didn’t really know what to do with the internet. It has got slowly better and better, Dorna started to understand how the internet can help them. There’s lots of crap out on the internet, especially in the Spanish and Italian press writing any old thing, just to generate ‘hits’ and attraction. Dorna were very concerned and cautious about social media. That has changed over the years. In the last two or three years, Dorna have totally embraced it. For a long time, they spent most of their time chasing down video clips. Now what they’re doing, which I told them to do five years ago, is getting the content out their immediately. Using the Snappy.TV clips have been really, really good and they’ve been using those clips. If something dramatic happens, the first thing fans do at home is share that video clip. When MotoGP immediately shares that clip, everyone else shares that clip because it is in much better quality.

F1B: The Rossi and Marquez crash had 20 million views on Facebook, you can’t buy those numbers.

DE: It’s Donald Trump’s election strategy really, earned media instead of actually buying media. You just say something ridiculous and people report it.

F1B: What is the future post Valentino Rossi? What is going to happen to MotoGP?

DE: Quite honestly, it will be smaller. This is one of Dorna’s biggest concerns. One of the reasons they’ve changed a lot of the technical regulations is to try and create exciting racing and to create a structure where young riders come and grow their fans. You’re also seeing team structures, so the Marc VDS take young riders aged 12 or 13 from mini bikes all the way up to MotoGP, and that talent can be coached and helped along the way. There’s lots and lots of talent, the problem is: how do you replace an icon like Valentino Rossi? The honest answer is you don’t. What you have to do is mitigate the effect. So what you want when he goes is a stable, attractive product in place which will retain some of the existing fan base. The idea is people come and see Valentino Rossi, but they stay because they find MotoGP an interesting and exciting sport. Dorna are trying to figure out what the sport is. They’re not F1, they’re not champagne and glamour, but we are a little bit upmarket and a little bit edgy. It is trying to figure out what the brand of MotoGP is, what motor cycle racing is and how to sell it. One of the biggest problems they face is that MotoGP riders are now sportsmen or sportswomen. They’re professional athletes, which is a problem because they tend to be boring. They train, they race and they sleep, and that’s it. They’re not formed as humans. In the 1970s and 80s, Barry Sheene had a hole drilled on his helmet so he could have a cigarette through it. He could afford to do that because the sport was much less developed in terms of physical training. You can’t go out on a Saturday evening and get steaming drunk like the 80s. The boys and girls like to go out and have a party but it is much more controlled and restricted. Their partying is constrained by a strict training regime. This isn’t just MotoGP, it is also to an extent in F1 and a lot of other professional sports, they’re fairly dull. There’s the pressure of sponsors, the more money there is in the sport, the less freedom there is to be a maverick.

F1B: Where does pay-TV stand within all the MotoGP change and social media?

DE: Well pay-TV is the future of a lot of professional sports. Someone has to pay for it. Large public broadcasters are not prepared to pay large amounts of money; they can’t afford it. So, for example, it goes to BT Sport because BT are trying to flog broadband connections. So they can afford to spend money on the likes of football and MotoGP because they are linking their package together to sell broadband. That’s why it ends up on pay-TV, advertising revenues are changing. You can’t subsidise as much straight from advertising.

F1B: Is one of the concerns post-Rossi is that sponsors will leave, which will increase pay-TV deals exponentially again?

DE: To be frank, that’s going to be more of a problem for teams than for the sport and a lot of the sponsorship people are working very much on building relationships. So, for example, Phillip Morris, the tobacco people still sponsor Ducati. It’s just you don’t see Marlboro anywhere, but they use it as a way to build relationships. They’re doing it very differently. Sponsors are using teams to build relationships, making them less reliant on a particular figure to entertain their clients and to do business.

My thanks go to David Emmett for spending the time with me on the above interview.