BBC F1 vs Sky Sports F1: Your 2014 Verdict Revealed

The Abu Dhabi Grand Prix concluded just under two weeks ago. After the race, I asked for your opinion on the BBC and Sky Sports Formula 1 programming this season. The response from readers have been fantastic, with 35 comments in total, a lot of them in depth, making for interesting reading.

The main conversation that dominated throughout was the improvement of Sky Sports F1’s coverage compared to 2013. Whilst there are one or two people who are not yet happy with the coverage, on the whole, things do seem to be changing.

The Sky team work together much better now than they did in there first season. It’s a well oiled machine now and for sure they have delivered on what they promised at the outset, by giving it the full Sky Sports treatment. Yes it may be expensive but it’s worth it in my opinion. – Mick

Once again Sky, well better coverage and longer builds than the BBC has, their graphics are mind blowing and their features are fantastic. – RubbishMonkey2014

Jamie praises Sky’s coverage, however says that the punditry does come across as “a bunch of middle aged men in suits having a chat.” I really like the point made by Elliot Smith, which would mirror ITV4’s British Touring Car Championship coverage if implemented:

Seeing as Sky have a dedicated channel I think, at least for the European races, they should have something like qualifying day live and race day live, where they are live from the start of FP3 through to the end of the GP3 race and then do the same on Sunday with GP3, GP2, get Porsche Supercup rights and show them, then have the F1 race. Also they really should have proper presenters for the GP2 and GP3 rather than just using the world feed.

With Sky’s coverage improving according to the majority of users that commented, the BBC’s coverage appears to be heading into reverse:

Despite having to pay for Sky F1 which still grates – I have given up on the BBC coverage completely. – C Williamson

The BBC is so bad now, losing some of their popular staff (most of them moved to Sky), plus the analysis is well behind compared to Sky’s analysis. – RubbishMonkey2014

Rob disagrees, but does believe that their coverage has dropped since Jake Humphrey left as presenter:

I have seen both Sky and the BBC coverage and will always choose the BBC. Okay, their coverage has dropped considerably from the Jake Humphrey days but it is still a lot better than Sky.

Another key subject was the commentary, however, there were clearly more negative comments about the BBC’s commentary compared with Sky:

Edwards gets worse and worse. It seems they don’t actually want to acknowledge that any of Sky’s presenters exist – Edwards’s tone when he found out Brundle was doing the podium interviews in Abu Dhabi; Coulthard saw Brundle coming on the grid walk in Abu Dhabi and went the long way around Hamilton’s car to avoid him; Edwards will go “oh, there’s [celebrity] in the [team] garage” for every single celebrity except Johnny Herbert or Damon Hil. – Rhys Benjamin

Also I have noticed that both the BBC and Sky commentary teams have started every single race with ‘Lights out and away we go…’ Is this now the only way to call the start of a motor race? I like a catchphrase as much as the next man but for me this isn’t even a particularly good one? – Lonestarstraits

An aspect of BBC’s coverage that has improved compared with last year is Suzi Perry’s presenting. James Rowe summarises the picture:

Regarding presenters, I think Suzi Perry has improved this year, I still don’t believe she is the best fit for the role but year-on-year, her rough edges have been smoothed out a touch.

Sky’s bias towards Lewis Hamilton was noted by readers such as f1picko, others said that this is not a Sky only issue:

If anything, I felt both were pro-Hamilton this season, which is annoying for someone like myself who wanted Rosberg to win. In Canada, Edwards shouted down the mic “ROSBERG GOES OFF AND HAMILTON LE—-oh, sorry, no he doesn’t.” – Rhys Benjamin

There were a few NBC related comments, all negative it has to be said. I’m going to be reviewing two of NBC’s F1 programming on this blog in the next month or so. I’ll end this with a comment that I completely agree with. “The dream team”, shall we call it.

Still hard to avoid the general conclusion that both channels have some excellent people / ideas and some dross and that if you put the two together it would be much better. – Richard

As always, the original post has a lot of detailed comments worth reading, the above is just a taster of what readers are talking about.

BT Sport’s MotoGP coverage: Your 2014 Verdict Revealed

Last month, following the conclusion of the 2014 MotoGP season, I asked you for your verdict on BT Sport’s MotoGP coverage. Thanks to all of you for the responses on the linked post, which I have summarised below.

Their inaugural season was an eventful one for the team, especially in the first half with the departure of Melanie Sykes. To say that comments drastically varied would be an understatement, with no real agreement. IAP29 says that BT Sport’s coverage is a huge improvement over what the BBC offered, however posters such as James Rowe and Adam called their coverage ‘average’.

The main praise from a number of posters surrounds Neil Hodgson, primarily due to the fact that he is a former rider and was actually on-location at the majority of races.

Hodgson and Emmett were pretty good and were the highlights of the coverage, as they were actually at the racetrack and could actually interact with the people in the paddock. – Adam

Hodgson is fine and interacts well with the riders. – john carlisle

mark sansom added that Hodgson’s on-board laps were really insightful, noting that he could not find any faults with BT’s coverage.

That is the only part that contributors agreed was a positive. There was indifference towards the commentary and negativity towards the studio. Not one comment was positive about the studio, suggesting that it should be axed, or at least significantly reduced for 2015.

BBC set the standard, and BT didn’t better it. Clipboards replaced iPads and Presentation went from Pit Lane to a Studio in London. Their intro, outro, and commercial break idents were effectively identical. BT need to improve for next year. – f1picko

The studio part baffles me, to the point where I think it would be better just being presented by Gavin [Emmett] and Neil [Hodgson] trackside! And how many presenters have we seen this year? [Melanie] Sykes, Chris Hollins, Abi Griffiths, Iwan Thomas, etc. They need a consistent presenter who is preferably knowledgeable of MotoGP! – IAP29

I think Daniel Clarke makes a very interesting comment, suggesting that the studio was utilised because their coverage was running to a very tight budget, especially considering how much BT Sport spent on the UEFA Champions League.

The big point that multiple people noted about the commentary was the noticeable bias towards British riders, some also not warming to Keith Huewen and Julian Ryder as a whole:

The race commentary is okay, I much preferred Parrish and Cox on the BBC, they had a genuine relationship and complimented one another really well. I’m not saying Huewen and Ryder aren’t good, but I just prefer the old BBC team. – James Rowe

Huewen and Ryder did their job, but were a bit too supportive of the Brits – sound familiar (North One Production). – Adam

As for commentators, it would be a dream to get Steve Parrish and Charlie Cox back with their easygoing, friendly, informative approach and, possibly the greatest talent of all, the sense to realise they’re broadcasting to bikers and there are times when the commentary team need to SHUT UP so we can enjoy the sound of a pair of Hondas or Ducatis or Aprilias running in tandem. – john carlisle

Daniel Clarke does state that the coverage was comprehensive, saying “that’s all that really matters” at the end of the day. Lastly, a comment about the presenter, should BT Sport appoint a new MotoGP presenter. James Rowe calls the decision to appoint Melanie Sykes back in February “shambolic”. Let us hope that the decision that BT Sport make regarding the presenter’s role is not as shambolic as the Sykes debacle…

Scheduling: The 2014 Punta del Este ePrix

The cold winter days are upon us, which means that the motor sport season is over. Well, not quite. With Formula E running through the winter, your motor sport fix is actually never far away!

Round 3 of the series takes place in Uruguay and ITV4 has full live coverage again. Jennie Gow presents the show alongside Alex Brundle and Mark Priestley in the studio. Jack Nicholls and Dario Franchitti will be on location commentating, with Nicki Shields down in pit lane. No coverage of qualifying on ITV4, but the action will be streamed on Formula E’s website, details are listed below.

As well as Formula E, there is the annual Race of Champions event, which airs live on Motors TV. Frustratingly, the Nations Cup portion clashes with Formula E, however Motors TV is repeating the running in full on Sunday afternoon so this is not too much of an issue.

Formula E – Punta del Este (online via FIAFormulaE.com)
13/12 – 12:30 to 13:00 – Practice 2
13/12 – 14:00 to 14:55 – Qualifying

Formula E – Punta del Este (ITV4)
13/12 – 17:00 to 19:30 – Race
14/12 – 09:30 to 10:30 – Highlights

Race of Champions (Motors TV)
13/12 – 16:00 to 19:05 – Nations Cup
14/12 – 12:55 to 16:00 – Nations Cup (R)
14/12 – 16:00 to 19:05 – Race of Champions

As always, I’ll update the above if anything is added or changed.

Update on December 13th – As per this tweet from Jack Nicholls, practice one is not broadcast online. Apologies.

How F1 2014’s timings would have changed – Bianchi report

The findings of the Accident Panel have been published today surrounding Jules Bianchi’s accident at the Japanese Grand Prix.

The panel came to 11 conclusions and seven recommendations. One recommendation states that “it is proposed that a regulation or guideline be established such that the Start time of an event shall not be less than 4 hours before either sunset or dusk, except in the case of night races.”

How would such a rule affect the timings on race day where the calendar is concerned? If we’re to look at the 2014 calendar, a total of six races would have been affected. In most cases though, this is a movement on one hour rather than anything significant. However, Australia and Japan would have been brought forward by two hours, Australia would have a start time of 04:00 UK time, with Japan at 05:00 UK time. Let’s not forget, the reason Australia was pushed later in the first place was to boost European viewing figures and at broadcasters demand, so it will be interesting to see if any change comes in for 2015.

Anyway, here is what would have changed for 2014…

Australian Grand Prix – 16 March
=> actual: 17:00 / 06:00
=> proposed: 15:00 / 04:00
=> sunset is 19:38 – http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/australia/melbourne?month=3&year=2014
Malaysian Grand Prix – 30 March
=> actual: 16:00 / 09:00
=> proposed: 15:00 / 08:00
=> sunset is 19:22 – http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/malaysia/kuala-lumpur?month=3&year=2014
Chinese Grand Prix – 20 April
=> actual: 15:00 / 08:00
=> proposed: 14:00 / 07:00
=> sunset is 18:26 – http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/china/shanghai?month=4&year=2014
Japanese Grand Prix – 5 October
=> actual: 15:00 / 07:00
=> proposed: 13:00 / 05:00
=> sunset is 17:33 – http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/japan/suzuka?month=10&year=2014
Russian Grand Prix – 12 October
=> actual: 15:00 / 12:00
=> proposed: 14:00 / 11:00
=> sunset is 18:43 – http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/russia/sochi?month=10&year=2014
US Grand Prix – 2 November
=> actual: 14:00 / 20:00
=> proposed: 13:00 / 19:00
=> sunset is 17:43 – http://www.timeanddate.com/sun/usa/austin?month=11&year=2014

Alternatively, if you’re looking at ways of boosting viewing figures without hindering driver safety, you could push all European races to a start time of 16:00 or 17:00 local time. Based on this year’s calendar, Monaco has sunset at 20:59, Budapest is 20:25, Spa is 20:45 and Silverstone is 21:19, so a start time of 16:00 or 17:00 local time would be reasonable. In fact, I’m surprised that has not already happened.