The Twitter outlook – 2013 update

Those of you who followed my blog in the early days may remember a series of posts entitled ‘The Twitter outlook’. Throughout 2012, from launch until the end of the year, I posted a weekly social media update detailing each of the Formula 1 driver followers. I decided to scrap it for 2013 because, I’ll be honest, it was a bit mundane and I didn’t feel it was adding to the blog. That isn’t to say that social media is not important, in fact it is completely the opposite. It is, in my view, the drivers’ and teams’ gateway to communicating with their fans, as fans attempt to get even more engaged with the sport they love.

The 2013 Formula 1 grid comprised of 23 drivers and 11 teams in total, Heikki Kovalainen the extra driver having replaced Kimi Raikkonen for the final two races of 2013. Adrian Sutil joined Twitter mid-way through 2013, meaning only two drivers on the grid don’t have Twitter: Raikkonen and Sebastian Vettel. In the past few days, with the very sad news about Michael Schumacher, we have seen what can happen when fakers are mis-interpreted as real accounts: they are quoted on TV or radio. For some reason, it appears some are unable to conduct a simple Google search asking the question. It does make those journalists foolish, especially the Formula 1 journalists that follow said accounts who should know better having tracked their every movement for nine months of the year.

Whilst the 2014 Formula 1 grid has not been completed we know already that, as of writing, Kevin Magnussen does not have Twitter. Credit goes out to those who communicate regularly with fans on Twitter, that statement of course excluding the series organisers who are still behind the times (the linked blog post was written in October 2012, the situation is still the same a year and a bit later, disappointingly). The list below shows the number of Twitter followers for each driver, with the teams next to each driver. It is fairly self explanatory, in some cases there is a slash (/) in the event a driver has switched between 2013 and 2014. For historical purposes, and so there is not confusion, I’ve moved any drivers who we know are definitely not racing in 2014 to the bottom.

Drivers
1,891,994 – Fernando Alonso (Ferrari)
1,831,006 – Lewis Hamilton (Mercedes)
1,636,514 – Jenson Button (McLaren)
584,433 – Pastor Maldonaldo (Williams / Lotus)
551,944 – Sergio Perez (McLaren / Force India)
478,701 – Felipe Massa (Ferrari / Williams)
439,039 – Nico Rosberg (Mercedes)
310,239 – Paul di Resta (Force India / TBC)
270,944 – Heikki Kovalainen (Lotus / TBC)
223,482 – Nico Hulkenberg (Sauber / Force India)
221,792 – Romain Grosjean (Lotus)
155,915 – Daniel Ricciardo (Toro Rosso / Red Bull)
151,631 – Charles Pic (Caterham / TBC)
106,858 – Jean-Eric Vergne (Toro Rosso)
101,358 – Esteban Gutierrez (Sauber)
76,501 – Max Chilton (Marussia / TBC)
73,464 – Jules Bianchi (Marussia)
65,796 – Giedo van der Garde (Caterham / TBC)
49,916 – Valtteri Bottas (Williams)
15,257 – Adrian Sutil (Force India / Sauber)
10,734 – Daniil Kvyat (N/A / Toro Rosso)
…..
856,151 – Mark Webber (2013 – last race)
620,460 – Bruno Senna (2012 – last race)
296,753 – Pedro de la Rosa (2012 – last race)
225,757 – Narain Karthikeyan (2012 – last race)
135,690 – Timo Glock (2012 – last race)
125,480 – Kamui Kobayashi (2012 – last race)
124,937 – Vitaly Petrov (2012 – last race)

Fernando Alonso, Lewis Hamilton and Jenson Button are still the three runaway drivers at the front, leading Formula 1’s social media profile. Alonso has had his Twitter less time than Hamilton and Button which shows his popularity with fans worldwide. At this point, Mark Webber would have been next, but moving to the World Endurance Championship means that his followers will not find themselves ‘tapped into’ F1, but instead WEC, which should improve their social media profile a fair bit. Outside of the top three though, there is a huge drop down – Pastor Maldonaldo, Sergio Perez, Felipe Massa and the rest all have less than a third of the top three followers, a huge gulf between the top three and the rest!

An interesting spot is the Central and South American influence on the table, all of those drivers rate highly despite none of the three having a good season. Down at the bottom, Adrian Sutil has only had his Twitter account half a year, so his follower numbers should increase significantly in 2014. If I was to make a prediction, I’d say that Daniel Ricciardo, Valtteri Bottas and Daniil Kvyat are likely to make the biggest increases in 2014. I’m surprised Bottas’ is not higher actually given how #BOTTAS is made a big thing of from time to time. Who has increased the most in 2013? Like above, I’ve split it into current drivers and former drivers, although I’ve numbered the current drivers so we have some comparison.

Drivers – Increases
01 – 539,568 – Lewis Hamilton (up 1)
02 – 487,572 – Fernando Alonso (down 1)
03 – 343,511 – Jenson Button (n/a)
04 – 267,614 – Pastor Maldonaldo (up 3)
05 – 236,015 – Felipe Massa (up 1)
Average driver = 213,625
06 – 210,320 – Nico Rosberg (up 6)
07 – 183,786 – Sergio Perez (down 3)
08 – 128,080 – Paul di Resta (up 7)
09 – 125,459 – Charles Pic (up 12)
10 – 120,527 – Romain Grosjean (up 4)
11 – 119,481 – Nico Hulkenberg (up 6)
12 – 97,722 – Daniel Ricciardo (up 4)
13 – 65,952 – Heikki Kovalainen (down 3)
14 – 65,346 – Jean-Eric Vergne (up 6)
…..
337,919 – Mark Webber
85,990 – Pedro de la Rosa
85,212 – Bruno Senna
60,153 – Narain Karthikeyan
41,772 – Timo Glock
23,443 – Kamui Kobayashi
8,137 – Vitaly Petrov

After being overtaken by Fernando Alonso towards the end of 2012, Lewis Hamilton recorded the biggest increase of 2013. The order to some degree mirrors that of the first list, with a heavy Central and South American influence near to the top. A worthy mention further down goes to Charles Pic, noticeably one of the drivers who did not budge too much week-by-week in 2012, managed to pile on 125,000 followers throughout the entire of 2013 – going from 25,000 to 150,000 followers, meaning that he jumped ahead of several drivers. This surprised me a bit, but it may show how more people follow Caterham ‘as a team’ rather than Marussia, possibly explaining Pic’s large increase.

Despite moving to a more high profile team, Sergio Perez dropped three positions in comparison to his rivals where comparing the relative increases, whilst he fell behind Pastor Maldonaldo in the overall chart. The smallest increase year-on-year goes to Jean-Eric Vergne, although this should not be shocking considering he is part of one of the least socially active teams on Twitter in terms of identity. As for the non-F1 drivers, we can see what happens when you leave F1: you start gaining less followers per week! I am wondering though just why Vitaly Petrov has only gained 6,000 followers in 2013, seems incredibly low. Moving onto the teams…

Teams
677,460 – Ferrari
485,166 – McLaren
407,249 – Red Bull
363,365 – Mercedes
350,777 – Lotus
191,281 – Williams
175,082 – Sauber
172,720 – Force India
165,281 – Marussia
161,140 – Caterham
120,703 – Toro Rosso
62,880 – HRT

A significant change in 2013 was McLaren redeveloping their social media profile by renaming their Twitter channel. Instead of being called ‘TheFifthDriver’, they were now known as ‘McLarenF1’. Although the previous name did stand out for being different, I can see why they changed it to bring it in-line with just about everything else McLaren. The Fifth Driver no longer made sense for them to keep and hence, it was ditched. There are not many changes above, except that Williams jumped from tenth to sixth, so clearly they have done something right. The Maldonaldo effect, again? I’m not entirely sure why, but there is clearly some reason why both Maldonaldo and Williams jumped up in 2013.

And yes, there is a reason HRT is there…

Teams – Increases
01 – 275,153 – Ferrari (n/a)
02 – 206,895 – McLaren (up 1)
03 – 198,429 – Red Bull (down 1)
04 – 190,931 – Mercedes (up 2)
05 – 181,635 – Lotus (down 1)
Average team = 124,764
06 – 103,409 – Williams (down 1)
07 – 79,506 – Sauber (up 2)
08 – 76,358 – Force India (n/a)
09 – 68,644 – Marussia (down 2)
10 – 64,650 – Caterham (n/a)
11 – 60,739 – Toro Rosso (n/a)
12 – -9,176 – HRT (n/a)

…people actually unfollow others! Yes, HRT are now defunct, sadly, which meant no Twitter activity. From a social media point of view, it is rare to see people lose followers by a significant amount. So going from 72,000 to 63,000 is an interesting development as it means 9,000 people have unfollowed in the last twelve months. Either that, or HRT actually paid people to follow them, by buying ‘fake followers’. Which is quite an interesting point to mention the concept of ‘fake followers’. People can buy followers so they double or triple overnight. It is unlikely, but any F1 driver or team could do that. I could extend that to even myself, I could ‘buy’ 30,000 followers just to look good (not sure why I would, because it is just a number, and quality over quantity!).

Ferrari remained on top anyway here, and McLaren’s change of social media policy did not result in much, although they did leapfrog Red Bull. Mercedes and Lotus were not too far behind, one imagines Mercedes benefited hugely from the signing of Hamilton at the end of 2012. Outside of the top five, there is a gaggle beginning with Williams, as noted above. Toro Rosso’s numbers are pitiful, the team needs a non-Red Bull identity if it is going to get anywhere, but that doesn’t look like happening. Like FOM itself, Toro Rosso is one of the few that just has not exploited Twitter in the way it should have. It has to be said though that most of the F1 team numbers are relatively low in the grand scheme of things. Although it is a team sport, the fans follow drivers more than teams if the raw numbers are to go by.

Driver and Team statistics as of Monday 30th December 2013.

Formula 1 websites and their popularity – 2013 spec

Some people who read the blog in the relatively early days just over a year ago may remember a piece I did entitled “Formula 1 websites and their popularity“, in which I compared the popularity of thirteen Formula 1 websites and seen which is more popular than the other. Now that the 2013 season is over, I thought it may be worthwhile to see which websites have made considerable strides in their readership numbers for the year, or vice versa as the case may be.

Again, the key here is “the lower the rank, the higher the hits”. In brackets is the difference versus 2012. Obviously the further down you go, the difference may be wildly different as a few hundred or thousand hits could make a huge difference, but it is an interesting experiment nevertheless.

– 2,686 – The official Formula 1 website (down 319 on October 2012 ranking)
———–———–———–———–———–
– 01 – 6,557 – AUTOSPORT (down 162 on October 2012 ranking)
– 02 – 7,775 – ESPN F1 (down 340 on October 2012 ranking)
– 03 – 9,676 – Auto Motor Und Sport (down 928 on October 2012 ranking)
– 04 – 17,803 – PlanetF1.com (down 1,119 on October 2012 ranking)
– 05 – 20,155 – GPUpdate.net (down 3,022 on October 2012 ranking)
– 06 – 24,661 – Crash.net (up 7,668 on October 2012 ranking)
– 07 – 25,736 – F1Fanatic.co.uk (up 8,206 on October 2012 ranking)
– 08 – 28,873 – Motorsport.com (up 39,658 on October 2012 ranking)
– 09 – 66,913 – James Allen on F1 (up 23,236 on October 2012 ranking)
– 10 – 92,945 – GrandPrix.com (up 45,471 on October 2012 ranking)
– 11 – 117,174 – F1Today.net (up 109,537 on October 2012 ranking)
– 12 – 147,190 – Pitpass.com (down 1,443 on October 2012 ranking)

For reference, I have included the official Formula 1 website, which is significantly higher than the highest dedicated Formula 1 news site. Also, BBC F1 and Sky Sports F1 are excluded from the list as the figures are not on the Alexa Web Company website, and besides, their figure would dwarf the ones listed above.

The only raw change in the table is that F1Today.net has overtaken Pitpass, however the table itself is a tale of two halves. I would have expected the main Formula 1 websites to be down year-on-year anyway due to Sebastian Vettel’s dominance in the latter half of the season. AUTOSPORT unsurprisingly is top of the websites worldwide thanks to its weekly magazine, with ESPN and Auto Motor Und Sport in third. The latter is Germany’s main Formula 1 site so a lot of its traffic is generated from Central Europe from countries such as Germany along with Austria and Switzerland to name two examples. ESPN’s website famously used to be F1 Live, which is why they are so high up the chart.

PlanetF1 (an indirect subsidiary of BSkyB) and GPUpdate both recorded drops, but then the statistics show a complete 180. Crash.net up, F1Fanatic.co.uk up and Motorsport.com significantly up. James Allen’s blog is also improving its user base which should not be a surprise to anyone. The gap, on the basis of this table is closing, with fans moving from your traditional news services to forum and blog based conversation. If you think about it, nowadays you have Allen with a blog, Joe Saward runs a blog, Will Buxton, Adam Cooper, the list goes on. It is with these blogs – the first two in particular where communities are formed, which drives traffic.

Of course, the above is not a definitive list, I’ve named thirteen Formula 1 websites. There are hundreds of websites that blog, write stories and create stories. Have I missed any websites out that may feature in the table above? (don’t mention mine, please!) On a serious note, it would be interesting to see how many of the above thirteen websites readers have visited. For me, I read AUTOSPORT, F1Fanatic.co.uk, James Allen’s site when it is linked from Twitter and that is about it. I do go onto the official Formula 1 website, but only if I’m looking for scheduling information.

Source: Alexa Web Company. The ranks above are the three month average global traffic rank for each website taken on November 29th, 2013. I think Alexa is the most reliable for tracking web analytics, but even if it is not, I thought it would be interesting to put these figures up for anyone interested.

Getting the ‘exclusive’

With a lot of rumours in the Formula 1 paddock at this time of the year, inevitably when things are concerned we get to see which journalists are right, which ones were wrong and who broke what exclusives, and crucially got the details correct. Now, you may be wondering “does it matter”? To the fans, who are reading the news, probably not. But to the journalists themselves, I would say that it does matter. Journalists, in their nature, exist to get a big story, to get that story that the rest of the fleet have been looking for. After all, getting exclusives drives internet traffic, it drives social media, it can, if you are a relatively small company drive the entire business.

Those that can remember back to Monaco will remember both Jonathan Noble and Andrew Benson, for AUTOSPORT and BBC respectively breaking the Mercedes “tyre gate” exclusive. It means a lot to journalists to get the story. So, imagine if you had a reporter or a journalist who has broken that exclusive, to look and find another website actually claiming to have an exclusive that is not theirs. In the case of Sky Sports F1, they have done that twice in the recent weeks. I know that I have been critical of them in the past, but unfortunately this past week, it is evident that they have been shouting from the rooftops about their own team bringing viewers ‘exclusives’ that were broken by another paddock journalist beforehand.

The first is Natalie Pinkham claiming David Croft “got the scoop” on Rob Smedley, Felipe Massa and Ross Brawn going to Williams. 96 people retweeted that, possibly for the detail, it is just a pity the bit about getting the scoop is far from the mark. If that actually turns out to be true then Ted Kravitz and also Autosprint deserve the credit. Kravitz noted Brawn going to Williams as early as last Sunday, whilst Autosprint on Thursday put the linked article online. So again, I am unsure Sky got the exclusive. It is not just Sky who do this though. Not necessarily with exclusives but ripping off other website’s articles. On the morning of September 5th, AUTOSPORT published a 2014 draft calendar. This then appeared on just about every other Formula 1 website imaginable. Many credited or linked the original source which is fine, but there are websites which just took the calendar and passed it off as their own, original journalism.

Finally, Kimi Raikkonen’s return to Ferrari. On August 1st, Pekka Franck (a Finnish journalist) broke the story on the SuomiF1 website. So Franck had the scoop, many weeks before the British journalists who swarm the paddock. This did not stop Johnny Herbert, David Croft and Pete Gill in this article claiming that their own Mark Hughes that the exclusive! Hughes, as well as his Sky duties works for AUTOSPORT, but thankfully AUTOSPORT employees on Twitter did not post about Hughes supposedly getting an exclusive. You could claim that Sky did not know about Franck breaking the story given that he is not a British based journalist. By that measure, I’m still not sure Hughes was the first.

I go back to the question I posed at the start of this post: “does it matter”? It is all about journalistic standards. If you are getting news from another website and basically doing a Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V job then in the very least you should be accrediting them and saying “yeah, I took X from Y, but am adding my Z bit of analysis and thoughts to it”. In Sky’s case, it is ripping off another journalists work and claiming it as their own – albeit not as an article, but in tweet form. Bad standards, in my view. And in the first attempt, it feels like an attempt to fuel someone’s ego. Deliberately? Who knows. But I don’t think, in the past year and a half I have seen Sky genuinely get an earth shattering Formula 1 exclusive on the scale of the Mercedes tyre fiasco or the Raikkonen contract or do an Eddie Jordan. In the words of Marc Priestley: “Finding it hilarious how many people seem to claim to have ‘broken’ the news first. It’s brilliant.”

Maybe “Sky sources” just don’t exist in the Formula 1 paddock meaning that they have to take other journalists exclusives and claim them as their own…

Update on April 5th, 2014 – It looks like I have a good reason to update this today. Sky Sports during their practice coverage AND also The F1 Show last night were hyping a ‘Mercedes exclusive’ with Martin Brundle and Mark Hughes. The feature played out during the Bahrain Grand Prix Qualifying show. Whilst there was no problem with the feature itself, in fact it was informative, and definitely did a great job at explaining the advantages of the split turbo, it actually wasn’t an exclusive!

Craig Scarborough did a feature on it with Peter Windsor for The Racer’s Edge before Melbourne, whilst Racecar Engineering mentioned it after the first test in Jerez! So, in other words, Sky’s exclusive has already been in the public domain for two months (worryingly, Scarborough says its not even accurate). As we can see from the original article before the update, Sky have history in claiming exclusives that are not always there. If Sky want an exclusive early, why don’t they actually get Scarborough, or someone from Racecar Engineering onto their coverage to explain it? Hopefully I’m not adding to this before the end of 2014…

FIA International Tribunal: How to follow

The FIA International Tribunal is taking place today in Paris, with an outcome expected either this afternoon or tomorrow morning. Although tweeting is banned from inside the court, matters are being covered via several outlets:

Television
– Live updates on Sky Sports News with Craig Slater and Ted Kravitz throughout the day
– Round-up on Sky Sports F1 with Ted Kravitz at 22:00
– Probably some updates on BBC News

Online
AUTOSPORT.com posting updates throughout the day
– BBC updates throughout the day via Sportsday
Sky Sports updates throughout the day

Twitter – Who to follow
– AUTOSPORT’s Jonathan Noble is normally the first to break news, so he is a must follow for today
– BBC’s Andrew Benson as well as the Sky Sports accounts are worth following too
– BBC do have Tom Clarkson out there, but he doesn’t tweet much

One thing to beware of though, and this happened back in 2007 with Spygate, is to be aware of misinformation. AUTOSPORT wrote, and later pulled an inaccurate article about McLaren’s punishment. Back then, there was no Twitter, but you can imagine how quickly that would spread today.

Alternatively, you don’t follow the updates and just catch it all this evening. I wouldn’t blame you if you do that, as you’d probably end up cutting through all the rubbish (and misinformation) in between.

Interaction

Currently, at the moment, Sky appear to operate with the following social media guidelines:

Sky Sports F1's current social media guideline, as I see it.
Sky Sports F1’s current social media guideline, as I see it.

For those of you who follow @SkySportsF1 or @SkyF1Insider on Twitter, you will notice that they rarely tweet during their shows (F1 sessions aside), that includes The F1 Show and the feeder series’ GP2 and GP3. Hence, at the moment we have a situation where they do not live tweet throughout their shows, meaning that there is little incentive for fans to tweet throughout their shows. I define ‘live tweeting’ as tweeting whilst the show is on air, the reason I say that is last week @SkyF1Insider tweeted behind the scenes videos last Friday, but they were before the show went to air, and all of those videos would not have made any significant difference as to who does or does not watch the show. As thus, there is no demand for other people to watch the show, in turn making no difference to the viewership. This cycle will rinse and repeat on a weekly basis, with no change on the horizon. No one really benefits, meaning that in the case of The F1 Show the viewership remains below 100,000 viewers.

I know someone is going to say “why did you not mention this last season?”. Quite simply because last year was Sky’s first season, and as thus they may have been coy on going in heavy on the interactivity because of the negativity towards the deal with BBC, so I can see why they did not do much on that side of things in 2012. But now in the second year of the deal, there is no reason why social media cannot play a bigger part in The F1 Show. Yes, they have introduced Your View, where viewers can e-mail their clips into the show. It is an improvement, but we are in 2013. Social media is the thing where instant communication is paramount. When you compare it to Jake Humphrey in 2011 looking on his phone scrolling down the tweets and selecting a few, Sky are light years behind where this is concerned. In my view, they should have the e-mail and live tweets, emphasis on the tweeting, it appears to me that even in year two Sky are ‘shying away’ from social media and live interaction on a weekly basis.

The diagram above should be more like this:

Sky Sports F1's social media guideline, as it should be.
Sky Sports F1’s social media guideline, as it should be.

Viewers tweeting in live can then have their thoughts discussed on the show, as well as the Twitter account discussing other users thoughts, the benefit of this would drive interaction instantly, resulting in more demand off viewers, and the end result is that viewers who would not normally tune in would be more inclined to tune in as a result. As well as this, dedicated @SkyF1Show, @SkyGP2 and @SkyGP3 accounts would be created to live tweet throughout shows, with @SkySportsF1 being used as their main hub. I think having @SkyGP2 and @SkyGP3 would help advertising their coverage where those two series’ are concerned as I have covered before on this blog, the only problem with that though is that as Sky take the GP2 and GP3 World Feed commentary with Will Buxton, I doubt they could mention those Twitter pages on air though. I’m surprised @SkyF1Show has not been created by them, though.

Am I right? I don’t know. But there must be a reason why Sky has individual accounts for @SoccerAM, @FantasyFC and other football related shows. I do think that The F1 Show at the moment is still not drawing in the viewers it should be, unless 70,000 to 80,000 viewers really is the roof. Whilst timeslot is definitely an issue, the amount of live interaction leaves a lot of potential left on the table.