Sky Sports F1 confirm Johnny Herbert as pundit for next 5 races

Sky Sports F1 have today confirmed on their Twitter account that Johnny Herbert will be part of their team for the Spanish Grand Prix, with Herbert being with the team from then through to the British Grand Prix.

As I noted several times in my ‘The Verdict so Far’ series, I think Herbert is an excellent pundit, thus I am pleased about this news. The tweet does not specifically confirm whether Herbert will be travelling to each of the five Grand Prix’s, but I suspect he will be.

I was considering watching BBC F1 next weekend had Herbert not been present with Sky Sports F1 (the Lazenby, Brundle and Hill line-up did nothing for me, mainly due to Hill’s woodenness), but this will, again make my viewing options difficult next weekend with Herbert back in the equation.

UPDATE at 17:45: Sky Sports F1’s online article is here, in which it is noted Johnny will be apart of The F1 Show and also provide ‘expert analysis’.

‘The Verdict so Far’ series – all five posts in one place

To save you looking for my posts in ‘The Verdict so Far’ series, of which the last blog went up earlier today, below is a link to each part:

– part 1: The Sky Sports F1 Team
– part 2: The BBC F1 Team
– part 3: Sky Sports F1’s weekend output
– part 4: Why Sky Sports F1’s mid-week programming needs a rethink
– part 5: The Ratings Picture

Enjoy! Alternatively, you can click on the Categories on the right-hand side, which directs you to all the posts on a particular subject.

The ratings picture: The Verdict so Far

To begin my Formula 1 broadcasting blog, I thought it would be a good idea to write a five-part series looking at the new broadcasting deal in the UK that has come into force this year. The fifth and final part of the series looks at the effect the BBC and Sky deal has had on television ratings this year, in comparison to previous years on the first four rounds of the championship.

For those unfamiliar, Formula 1 has been broadcast live regularly on terrestrial television in the UK since the late 1970’s. The 2012 to 2018 deal, which was announced last July, meant that only 50 percent of races will be broadcast live on BBC television. Since the 2000 Japanese Grand Prix, every race has been broadcast live on BBC1 or ITV1, or every race since the ill-fated 1994 San Marino Grand Prix if you ignore the 2000 US Grand Prix which was shown live on ITV2.

Figure 1.1.

Figure 1.1. shows the percentage of live races that have been shown on terrestrial television since 1992. The graph shows that at no time since then onwards has the amount of live races dropped below 75%, until this year. In 1993, the year in question where the percentage was 75% – the 4 out of 16 races that were not shown were Brazil, Canada, Japan and Australia – the two American timezone races and the two Asian timezone races. Had this year BBC and Sky decided that Sky had all the Asian and American races (excluding Brazil), I think they would have accepted that – but as it turns out the contract stipulated that Sky gets the first three exclusive picks, with the picks alternating after BBC’s first three picks, meaning that they get some of the European races exclusively to themselves. In any event the 50 percent is the lowest percentage of races live on terrestrial TV since at least 1991 – although in reality it is probably the lowest since the early 1980’s. For those without Sky, you can understand their anger towards the deal given the above statistics.

The ratings picture has been an interesting picture to follow for the past few years. As a Formula 1 fan, however, the trajectory the ratings have taken in this country in the past 15 to 20 years is probably an unsurprising one.

Figure 1.2.

Straight away, you can probably see where the ratings increased, and also where the ratings took a plunge. Although I won’t claim to have every single rating, see the note at the bottom of this post, you can make trends from the majority of ratings that I have. If you are to trace the graph over from 1992, 1992 was a high rating season with an average of over 5 million viewers per race, thanks to Nigel Mansell’s dominance in that season. With Mansell’s departure at the end of the 1992 season, figures in the UK plunged to an average of under 4 million viewers. This would turn out to be a ‘low level’ until the 2002 season. The emergence of Damon Hill though as a title contender, and the rise of German youngster Michael Schumacher, helped play their part as viewing figures rose from 4.1 million in 1994, to 5.3 million in 1996. That season, was also the last on BBC.

The move to ITV in 1997, and Hill’s move to Arrows in 1997 meant that figures dipped (with longer airtime and adverts), but still stayed extremely healthy for the titanic title battle between Schumacher and Jacques Villeneuve, followed by the Schumacher and Mika Hakkinen battles in 1998 – the 1998 season claiming the highest ratings of the ITV F1 era. Further healthy ratings in the 1999 season followed, before figures took a nose-dive for 2000 and the start of Michael Schumacher’s dominance. From that point onwards, the viewing figures dropped each and every year until the emergence of Lewis Hamilton in 2007. The 2000 season on ITV1 averaged over 4 million viewers, whereas the 2006 season had under 3 million viewers. The lowest point of that year was when the 2006 French Grand Prix recorded an average of 1.8 million viewers, while the Italian Grand Prix only bettered that by 100,000 – these figures quite possibly the lowest figures Formula 1 had ever seen in this country. Why the turn off? At the time, there was no major British title challengers in the UK. Jenson Button and David Coulthard were there or there abouts, but neither looked realistic title challengers. Schumacher’s dominance ended in 2004, Fernando Alonso’s emergence in 2005 did nothing to help the ratings picture. The European rounds in 2005 averaged 2.9 million viewers, while the daytime rounds in 2006 averaged 2.66 million viewers.

The 2007 season reversed Formula 1’s viewing figures trend in the United Kingdom, recording an average of 3.55 million. The title decider that season in Brazil recorded a mammoth 7.15 million viewers. The increase was only a sign of things to come however, as the 2008 season finished with a peak of 13.1 million viewers and an 8.8 million average for the Brazilian Grand Prix as ITV F1’s coverage came to a close. The average for Lewis Hamilton’s title winning season was 3.87 million, the highest average since 2001, and close to reversing the damage that the Schumacher years had done to the ratings. You may be thinking that the 3.87 million average is lower than that recorded in Damon Hill’s winning season, which recorded an average of 5.3 million. While all figures are for the programme averages, the BBC show was a lot shorter than ITV’s, hence why the 1996 figures are higher. But, the programme length since 1997 for ITV1’s coverage, and since BBC1’s coverage has stayed the same, so you can make valid comparisons.

With the start of Formula 1’s new broadcasting contract in 2009, Jenson Button’s title winning year live on the BBC brought an average of over 4 million viewers per race, bringing with him the highest viewership in a decade – since 1999 to be exact. The lack of commercials and the BBC’s more compelling pre and post-race format and punditry will no doubt have also helped here. The winning streak of Hamilton and Button ended for 2010, as here comes the rise of another German. This one is called Vettel. Another plunge in ratings, I hear you say? Nope. An increase, rather bizarrely in fact. This is due to fascinating and close-racing in my opinion more than anything else, with Pirelli’s tyres, DRS and KERS becoming a hit with casual viewers, lighting up ratings. Moments such as Button’s overtake on Vettel in Canada last year have helped keep viewership high in this country. Last year’s viewership averaged 4.55 million, a fantastic figure in the multichannel television age, and higher than a ton of shows get today on terrestrial television. On the track, there was only one aim for Vettel. Just Drive. To make it to the line. First.

Which leads us nicely to the mid-Summer bombshell that greeted the Hungaroring paddock in July 2011. The news that Sky Sports were joining the Formula 1 party in 2012. And how have they done? So far, okay. Their figures are massively down on BBC’s figures, but that is to be expected. BBC is available to everyone, Sky Sports is not. The name of the game here is to combine the BBC and Sky figures, throw them together and then do a comparison. Which I’ve done underneath:

Averages (Australia, Malaysia and China)
2007 – 3.45 million
2008 – 4.14 million
2009 – 4.66 million
2010 – 4.25 million
2011 – 4.46 million
2012 – 3.96 million

Bahrain is not included in the above figures because the race was not held last year, so to keep it a fair comparison, it is excluded. With an average of 3.96 million, the season has the lowest average since 2007, which had 3.45 million for those three rounds. If you bring back Bahrain into the equation, but ignore 2011, you get the following:

Averages (Australia, Malaysia, China and Bahrain)
2007 – 3.21 million
2008 – 3.96 million
2009 – 4.59 million
2010 – 4.38 million
2011 – n/a
2012 – 4.07 million

Which brings the 2012 average to 4.07 million, lower than 2009 and 2010 but higher than 2007 and 2008. One final way to look at it is to bundle the average for the opening four races, after all if you remember China was only moved to the start of the season in 2009, which may complicate the picture slightly.

Averages (first 4 rounds of the championship)
2004 – 3.05 million
2005 – 3.10 million
2006 – 3.22 million
2007 – 3.28 million
2008 – 3.70 million
2009 – 4.59 million
2010 – 4.38 million
2011 – 4.29 million
2012 – 4.07 million

You can’t go back further than 2004 as the Brazilian Grand Prix was one of the first four rounds, thus inflating the average. Although the figures are down on the past few seasons, taking it to not as low as the ITV F1 level but lower than the BBC F1 level. One thing worth noting is that the opening round in Australia did not do as well as in previous years, recording 3.31 million viewers on BBC One for the highlights and Sky Sports F1 live, the lowest average since 2004. Since Australia though, figures have increased to higher levels. If we are to look at the split for China, the only race where both BBC and Sky Sports were live, BBC live had 2.85m (39.4%), while Sky Sports live had 480k (6.98%). Both channels had a peak of 4.21m and 887k respectively. Once the BBC re-run is factored in, the averages work out at a total of 4.93 million, a fantastic figure. Although Sky, one might argue, only had 480k tuning in overall, I think they and BBC individually will be very pleased with the figures, Sky with their near 1 million peak for that race, and BBC with losing only 420k compared to the previous years. It shall be interesting to trace the picture over the next few months, but I don’t forsee any of the averages above overtaking the BBC averages from 2009 to 2011. I suspect the BBC average from 2011 will be the highest for several years and won’t be overtaken.

Over the Summer, F1 will face incredibly tricky competition, with Euro 2012 and the Olympic Games in London meaning that you can expect the Canadian, European, German and Hungarian figures to record very low figures. Will F1 whether the Summer storm, or will the Summer figures sink below 3 million and without trace? Or will a competitive season keep viewers watching? Time, shall tell.

This marks the end of my five part ‘The Verdict so Far’ series. I hope you’ve enjoyed the read. Although that particular series ends, this blog is only just beginning, so I hope you keep on reading. Comments, as always, are welcome!

Note: All the figures quoted here are the averages for the whole race programme, not the race average as these figures are unavailable. Figures are mostly official figures from BARB and Broadcast magazine. While I have made comparisons and analysis of figures, I should note that I do not have every single ratings figure. The figures for that races that I am missing are:

1992 – Australia, San Marino, France, Portugal, Japan (live and both for AUS, JPN)
1993 – France (live), Japan (highlights)
1994 – Pacific (highlights), San Marino, France, Hungary, Japan (live)
1995 – Australia, Argentina, San Marino, Spain, Japan (all live)
1996 – Canada, Japan (all live)
1997 – Japan (live)
1998 – Australia,France, Japan (all live)
2000 – Malaysia (live and re-run), Japan (live)
2001 – Japan (live)
2003 – Malaysia; Japan (both live)
2004 – China (live)
2006 – China (live)

If anyone is reading and has any of them ratings, leave a comment.

Sauber and Chelsea: Who benefits more?

The new link-up between the Sauber Formula 1 team and Chelsea football club that was announced earlier today was one that surprised me. Link ups between F1 and football teams have happened in the past. Most notably, Group Lotus (who owns the Lotus F1 Team) and Norwich City announced a tie-up last year, and Tony Fernandes is chairman of both Queens Park Rangers and Caterham Group.

I think with the latter two tie-ups, both firms benefit equally as neither is extremely well known or extremely good in their field – ie. Norwich are not on Premier League winning level and nor are Caterham. Chelsea, however, are much more well-known as they compete around Europe in the UEFA Champions League competition. Although Sauber compete all around the world with F1, I think that in terms of awareness, Chelsea have higher brand awareness than Sauber. The social media statistics would support this.

Facebook
9,850,154 fans – Chelsea F.C. (9 million)
0,019,470 fans – Sauber F1 (19 thousand)

Twitter
886,527 followers – Chelsea F.C.
48,923 followers – Sauber F1

Google
24 million hits – Chelsea F.C.
4 million hits – Sauber F1

While Sauber may benefit financially from this, I don’t see them benefiting elsewhere from this. Are Chelsea fans, who are also F1 fans going to switch their allegiances to Sauber because Chelsea support them? I don’t think so. At the same point, I don’t forsee Chelsea fans consuming Sauber products, or vice-versa. At 09:00 this morning, this was the amount of Twitter followers both Chelsea and Sauber had:

884,429 followers – Chelsea F.C.
47,380 followers – Sauber F1

So Chelsea’s has increased by 2,098 followers (or 0.023 percent), while Sauber’s has gone up by 1,543 followers (or 3.25 percent). For anyone who wants to have a look, Sauber’s sponsors are listed here, while Chelsea’s are listed here. I’m not sure about you, but I don’t think Sauber or Chelsea fans go out with their sponsors in mind, thinking “Chelsea have Samsung as their sponsors’, therefore I am more likely to buy a Samsung television”. I would give an example from Sauber’s sponsorship page, but I can’t think of an example, because nothing on that page appeals to me. I imagine there must be something more than financial benefit to both brands, otherwise they would not have entered this partnership. I won’t claim to be an expert in this area by any means, these are just my opinions on the matter without any “hard facts” before them to prove or disprove.

Before I close this blog, I should probably note why I’ve blogged about this on a broadcasting blog. For me, broadcasting encompasses and includes social media trends as well as other activity in this area, hence my blog on this subject matter.

Comments and thoughts welcome!

Sky Sports F1 – Top 10 ratings (week ending 22nd April, 2012)

From BARB:

1 – 819k – Live Bahrain Grand Prix (Sunday, 11:30)
2 – 462k – Live Bahrain Grand Prix: Qualifying (Saturday, 11:00)
3 – 186k – Live Bahrain Grand Prix: Practice 3 (Saturday, 08:45)
4 – 121k – Live Bahrain Grand Prix: Practice 2 (Friday, 11:45)
5 – 101k – Live Bahrain Grand Prix: Practice 1 (Friday, 07:45)
6 – 80k – Behind the Scenes at Mercedes (Saturday, 10:15)
7 – 58k – F1 Legends (Saturday, 10:25)
8 – 57k – Live Bahrain Grand Prix: GP2 Race 1 (Saturday, 13:40)
9 – 53k – Bahrain Grand Prix: Qualifying Replay (Saturday, 15:10)
10 – 53k – Bahrain Grand Prix: Practice 2 Replay (Friday, 17:01)