Motor sport ratings (week ending 15th September, 2013)

The BTCC was the main motor sport highlight in this week’s BARB round-up. The championship, coming from Rockingham, averaged 301,000 viewers across seven and a half hours on ITV4.

Over on Sky Sports F1, the first live airing of The F1 Show averaged 82,000 viewers, across four airings this increases slightly to 116,000 viewers. The live figure is the highest for the show since multi-21 in March which averaged 110,000 viewers, which is unsurprising considering Kimi Raikkonen’s move to Ferrari was announced two days earlier. In terms of highest rated editions, this is the top five for the studio shows:

1) ~200k (March 9th, 2012 – channel launch)
2) 110k (March 28th, 2013 – multi-21)
3) 86k (June 1st, 2012 – post-Monaco)
4) 83k (May 4th, 2012 – Mugello test)
5) 82k (September 13th, 2013 – Raikkonen to Ferrari)
6) 80k (September 28th, 2012 – Hamilton to Mercedes)

Interestingly, the multi-21 edition is also the only studio based edition to air on a Thursday, which should probably tell Sky something, although it has not been acted upon yet. Elsewhere on the channel, the Midweek Report averaged 17,000 viewers, as did the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.

BT Sport to screen IndyCar Series until 2015

BT Sport are to continue screening the IndyCar Series up to an including the 2015 season, it has been confirmed. Writing on Twitter, Mark Coyle, the channel’s Head of Digital Production noted: “We have the rest of this season then seasons 2014 & 2015.”

Although the series is still screened on ESPN UK under BT Sport’s ownership, the confirmation secures IndyCar Series’ future in the UK for the forthcoming future, so is very good news. I don’t know if the deal has been renegotiated or whether the original deal with ESPN UK was always three years, but it is still good to know.

Vettel keeps 4 million hooked on Singapore

Sebastian Vettel’s win in yesterday’s Singapore Grand Prix kept viewing figures roughly in line with 2012, viewing figures show. BBC One’s highlights programme averaged 3.14 million viewers, a 19 percent share from 17:00 to 18:30. Sky Sports F1’s live coverage averaged 630,000 viewers, a 6.5 percent share. What is unclear is what the average covers. If it is the original 11:30 to 16:15 slot, then I have to say that is a particularly disappointing rating considering they had exclusive coverage. We will have to wait and see.

Singapore Grand Prix – Official Ratings
2008 – 3.95 million
2009 – 4.42 million
2010 – 4.49 million
2011 – 4.46 million
2012 – 3.93 million / 4.09 million (using ‘35 percent theory‘)
– overnight figures were 3.81 million / 3.97 million
2013 – 3.77 million / 3.99 million (overnight rating)

The official ratings will budge 2013 level with 2012, I imagine the highlights show was dented by the Manchester Derby, so that may timeshift more than usual. Coincidentally, that match averaged 1.91 million viewers, peaking with nearly 3 million viewers, a fairly colossal number by Sky’s standards.

The 2012 Singapore Grand Prix ratings report can be found here. Ratings data for 2013 is from ITV Media.

Motor sport ratings (week ending 8th September, 2013)

 It is another week in the world of BARB, and after a brief hiatus in Belgium, we have Sky Sports F1 ratings! Phew. The Italian Grand Prix race programme officially averaged 476,000 viewers, up 19,000 viewers from the overnight rating. Comparisons with 2012 where this is concerned are largely invalid because of course Sky screened the race exclusively live last year. BBC’s airing of the race fell outside of the top 30.

Elsewhere on Sky Sports F1:

369,000 – Live Qualifying (Saturday, 12:00)
96,000 – Live Practice 3 (Saturday, 09:45)
67,000 – Live GP2 Race 1 (Saturday, 14:35)
53,000 – 1995 Italian Grand Prix Highlights (Saturday, 11:15)
—> see below for why the above is not entirely accurate…
51,000 – Live Practice 1 (Friday, 08:45)
46,000 – Live GP3 Race 2 (Saturday, 16:15)
41,000 – Live Practice 2 (Friday, 12:45)

A mixed bag of ratings above. The support races did well, in fact GP3 recorded a record high when comparing with Saturday races only which is fantastic to see! It was the second highest ever Saturday rating for GP2, only beaten by the German Grand Prix free weekend last year. The reason I call this a mixed bag though is because the F1 Legends edition featuring Alain Prost was absent.

Probably one of the most high profile people you will have on there and it fails to muster even 41,000 viewers which is disappointing. I don’t know why Sky via @SkyF1Insider promote an interview being aired tomorrow featuring Prost, but fail to promote an entire programme featuring Prost. That, I’m afraid is Sky logic for you. I know which one is more important for Sky to promote and it is definitely not the piece which will only make up a small portion of a long show…

Finally concerning Sky, the 53,000 viewers for the 1995 Italian Grand Prix highlights is not entirely accurate. Sky during those 45 minutes had major transmission problems, with TX seemingly flicking from the 1995 highlights to various other programming: Gear Up for Italy I think was one and Herbert’s Lemon was the other. It was all a bit of a mess, in all honesty!

Motors TV’s highest rating of 14,000 was for the Irish National Rally Championship, but other than the Formula 1, it was a quiet week in the land of motor sport and UK TV ratings.

Pushing along new innovations

Occasionally, from time to time, the people who control the World Feed (Formula One Management), are criticised, for a variety of reasons. This can vary from missing that crucial race winning moment or just simply providing a stale output. By ‘stale’ I mean sticking to the same old approach race after race, such as the usual start replays which tend to appear on lap 3, typically just after DRS is activated! Camera angles is another one. Compared to the Formula 1 of past, the majority of camera angles nowadays are designed to fit in as many adverts as humanely possibly. Sometimes, I do feel that the speed, and the sense of direction is not captured as well as it could have, due to camera angles being placed specifically to fit commercial and advertising needs.

This has led to virtual advertising. For the most part, this is fine. However, on occasion, it can lead to it being too obvious.

Fly Emirates: An example from FOM on how not to do virtual advertising...
Fly Emirates: An example from FOM on how not to do virtual advertising…

The image above is from Silverstone at Luffields. My motto tends to be that, where possible, the car should be the focus of the shot. Whether it is car racing towards you, or a change of direction as I alluded to at the start. For me, I don’t think that either of the two apply in the image above. The Fly Emirates advertising dominates the image and is in fact a complete distraction away from what my eyes are meant to be looking at. Deliberate? Possibly. I’m not a particular fan of these. The virtual advertisements that are subtle are the best. Yes, it means that I still spot them, but at the same point they end up not being a dominating part of the image as is the case above.

For all the criticism though, I do feel that FOM have made some significant strides forward this season where innovation is concerned. The first main one for me is helmet cam. First seen back at the 2008 Brazilian Grand Prix on David Coulthard’s car (albeit for only two corners), the innovation has been seen significantly more this season in Valtteri Bottas’ car. As always, it is a joy to have the helmet cam to see just how much work goes on behind the wheel of a Formula 1 car, and is probably one of the more important strides forward, I feel. Furthermore, the helmet cam has made its way down to GP3 with the camera being attached to Daniil Kvyat’s helmet, which I think is important as it gives the series more of an importance if innovations are being used further ‘down the chain’.

...but for every criticism, there is a positive, this being one of them from Monza.
…but for every criticism, there is a positive, this being one of them from Monza.

The recent pit lane changes by FIA as a result of the bouncing tyre at the Nurburgring meant that FOM cameramen were restricted to the pit lane wall during Qualifying and the Race. Instead of just keeping it at that, FOM decided to attach cameras to team personnel and the traffic lights pole, in one case. This resulted in some fantastic images being beamed around the world from the Monza pit lane as viewers got up close and personal with the pit crews as they were fast and frantic at work. The two examples last weekend with Red Bull and Ferrari, so I hope that continues for the remainder of the season.

The last innovation worth a mention has to be Paul di Resta’s thermal imaging tyre camera, which was frankly fantastic last weekend. I hope that the thermal imaging looking at the tyres doesn’t turn out to be a one hit wonder, and again I hope we do see it again before the end of the year. The only thing I think that needs to be added down the line is maybe some sort of temperature gauge to show how hot the orange colours really are, for example. In the past, there have been many innovations that have been thrown to the dustbin, and I hope that doesn’t happen here.

It has been a good patch though for FOM where innovations are concerned and I think that needs to be noted. Yes, there are bits which need to improve, but overall it has been a job well done by the whole production team recently. Now all we need is for their social media team (if they have one?) to get their act today, then we will all be happy bunnies.

All images, copyright Formula One Management, 2013.